<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The TalkTalk Blog &#187; Andrew Heaney</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/author/AH-xH9KzE/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 10:23:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>TalkTalk wins judicial review of Digital Economy Act</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/11/10/talktalk-wins-judicial-review-of-digital-economy-act/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/11/10/talktalk-wins-judicial-review-of-digital-economy-act/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 16:54:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DCMS]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DEA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[judicial review]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/?p=1235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We are very pleased to report that Mr Justice Wyn Williams announced that he was granting our request, jointly lodged with BT, for a judicial review of the parts of the Digital Economy Act relating to the obligations on ISPs which attempted to tackle illegal filesharing.
We had submitted our application on the basis that the Act [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/11/10/talktalk-wins-judicial-review-of-digital-economy-act/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Investing smartly in broadband&#8217;s future</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/10/22/investing-smartly-in-broadbands-future/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/10/22/investing-smartly-in-broadbands-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Inclusion]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DBUK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Race Online 2012]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/?p=1207</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Government outlined its spending review on Wednesday.  Buried in the detail was spending plans for broadband where they have committed an extra £300m (from the TV licence fee) on top of the £230m already allocated.
We wholeheartedly support the investment to get speeds up to a minimum of 2Mbps across the country – Lord Carter’s [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/10/22/investing-smartly-in-broadbands-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TalkTalk customers not affected by ACS:Law data protection breach</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/28/talktalk-confirms-that-customers-not-affected-by-acslaw-data-protection-breach/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/28/talktalk-confirms-that-customers-not-affected-by-acslaw-data-protection-breach/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Sep 2010 14:22:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Our customers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkTalk News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ACS:Law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data leak]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[data protection]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/28/talktalk-confirms-that-customers-not-affected-by-acslaw-data-protection-breach/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As reported widely in the media today, a list with names and addresses of some 8,000+ UK broadband users has been posted on the internet, along with details of adult films they are accused of sharing. The list belonged to ACS:Law, a law firm which writes letters to other ISPs’ customers that are accused by [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/28/talktalk-confirms-that-customers-not-affected-by-acslaw-data-protection-breach/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Julian Huppert MP calls Digital Economy Act “deeply worrying”</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/20/julian-huppert-mp-calls-digital-economy-act-%e2%80%9cdeeply-worrying%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/20/julian-huppert-mp-calls-digital-economy-act-%e2%80%9cdeeply-worrying%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 14:06:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/20/julian-huppert-mp-calls-digital-economy-act-%e2%80%9cdeeply-worrying%e2%80%9d/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We were very interested to read an interview on Broadband Genie with Julian Huppert MP about the Digital Economy Act (you can read the interview here).
 
Julian Huppert is a new MP so he wasn’t in Parliament to vote on the Digital Economy Act when it was going through the “wash up” just before the General [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/20/julian-huppert-mp-calls-digital-economy-act-%e2%80%9cdeeply-worrying%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TalkTalk criticises Digital Economy Act costs ruling</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/14/talktalk-criticises-digital-economy-act-costs-ruling/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/14/talktalk-criticises-digital-economy-act-costs-ruling/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:11:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/14/talktalk-criticises-digital-economy-act-costs-ruling/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We have consistently opposed the Digital Economy Act ever since it first emerged in its original form, as the Digital Economy Bill, back in the autumn of last year.
One of the primary aims of the Act is to reduce illegal downloading of copyrighted material by sending warning letters to people whose connections, according to the [...]]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/09/14/talktalk-criticises-digital-economy-act-costs-ruling/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Digital Economy Bill &#8211; it&#8217;s a wash up</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/04/08/digital-economy-bill-its-a-wash-up/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/04/08/digital-economy-bill-its-a-wash-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Apr 2010 09:41:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It looks like much of the Digital Economy Bill will make it through to get Royal Assent by the end of the week.

The Bill is now in much better shape than when first tabled by the Government last year – the ability of the Government to impose disconnection at will has been checked and the Henry VIII clause that literally allowed the Government to do anything else to reduce copyright infringement has been removed. 
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/04/08/digital-economy-bill-its-a-wash-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>185</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>TalkTalk&#8217;s response to &#8220;Clause 18&#8243;</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/31/response-to-clause-18/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/31/response-to-clause-18/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 16:52:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[clause 18]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy act]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[digital economy bill]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/?p=789</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[As you may have seen in the news a new “Clause 18” has been proposed for the Digital Economy Bill. This clause would force ISPs to block websites containing copyright infringing material.

 This is what we’ve got to say about it:
]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/31/response-to-clause-18/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Response to the Government&#8217;s 50p phone tax</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/24/response-to-the-governments-50p-broadband-tax/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/24/response-to-the-governments-50p-broadband-tax/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Mar 2010 15:02:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[DigitalBritain]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/24/1269442920000.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The 50p phone tax is an unfair, regressive and wasteful way of funding superfast broadband which would deliver less benefit than it will cost, slow superfast broadband roll-out and drive around 200,000 homes off broadband.]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/24/response-to-the-governments-50p-broadband-tax/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Dan Bull takes us back to the 80s when “home taping was killing music”</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/12/dan-bull-takes-us-back-to-the-80s-when-%e2%80%9chome-taping-was-killing-music%e2%80%9d/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/12/dan-bull-takes-us-back-to-the-80s-when-%e2%80%9chome-taping-was-killing-music%e2%80%9d/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 18:03:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadband]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/12/1268416980000.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[We all know that the government’s disconnection proposals to deter illegal filesharing are daft and dangerous. And many would agree that the way many people in the music industry have reacted is a little misguided. After all, haven’t we seen this type of scaremongering before?]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/03/12/dan-bull-takes-us-back-to-the-80s-when-%e2%80%9chome-taping-was-killing-music%e2%80%9d/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Stephen Fry has spoken – or should that be ‘tweeted’?</title>
		<link>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/02/03/stephen-fry-has-spoken-%e2%80%93-or-should-that-be-%e2%80%98tweeted%e2%80%99/</link>
		<comments>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/02/03/stephen-fry-has-spoken-%e2%80%93-or-should-that-be-%e2%80%98tweeted%e2%80%99/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:00:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Andrew Heaney</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Campaigns]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital Britain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[TalkTalk News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dontdisconnect.us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Filesharing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[petition]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/02/03/1265191200000.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Our “Sing Our Petition” contest against the Government’s filesharing proposals has been running for the past month. Entries finally closed last week and Stephen, who kindly agreed to judge it for us, has announced his favourite. ]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://www.talktalkblog.co.uk/2010/02/03/stephen-fry-has-spoken-%e2%80%93-or-should-that-be-%e2%80%98tweeted%e2%80%99/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

